Yep - I completely understand PIS (Police Involved Shooting) forms, those are completely justified, just like RTPC tactics self auth form.I think it would just add an extra step that would be annoying, especially when only a non-lethal. I understand if you did one if someone was seriously hurt as a result of you using one. However, just filling one out every time would take up to much time and quickly become annoying.
Couldn't you argue the same with a taser as it is technically classed as a firearm too?Yep - I completely understand PIS (Police Involved Shooting) forms, those are completely justified, just like RTPC tactics self auth form.
No, A taser temp stops a suspect by using electricity to not pose a long-term risk to the person's health. Whereas a firearm is made to stop the suspect and cause harm to the person to stop them. One kills the other just hurts.Couldn't you argue the same with a taser as it is technically classed as a firearm too?
For the purpose of the server (as they define not a serious RP server), having to complete a taser deployment every time is silly, where as PIS can be used in conjunction with other reports for a civ case, so in this case you can't compare a taser to a firearm.Couldn't you argue the same with a taser as it is technically classed as a firearm too?
They already have this implemented (just not visible to us)Instead of a deployment form as stated by other replies it could get tedious, how abouts like the speed camera integration with the discord a taser/discord integration?
This would basically work in the way of everytime a taser is deployed and it comes in contact with another member of the community, then an audit log would be placed in a channel. It could include the officer(s) name who deployed their taser, who got hit by said taser shot along with the time and location.