Declined Trained Tags

[Wolfie]

Just a suggestion but to avoid confusion and show whats available to new members etc, would it be a easier and an idea to have tags/roles depending what your trained in, for example when someone is RTPC but onyl Adv trained that can have the Advanced Tag, when they are TPAC they have the TPAC tag, then for ERT you can have tags showing they are IPP, AT, And AOP trained, or For AFO you can show them being Armed Interceptor or CTSFO trained

 

[Tizzy2k]

ERT and RTPC both possess team sheets in which you view what training different officers have been through, including IPP AT and AOP for ERT and all driver tickets and additional packages for RTPC.

 

[Intrise]

Just a suggestion but to avoid confusion and show whats available to new members etc, would it be a easier and an idea to have tags/roles depending what your trained in, for example when someone is RTPC but onyl Adv trained that can have the Advanced Tag, when they are TPAC they have the TPAC tag, then for ERT you can have tags showing they are IPP, AT, And AOP trained, or For AFO you can show them being Armed Interceptor or CTSFO trained

Hey Wolfie,

Thanks for raising your suggestion.

We have looked at this before, although having roles for each training aspect of a division would create a significant admin overhead. At the moment we're trying to limit the roles to a bare minimum on the premise of access provision either in Discord or in-game.

Thanks